Most
people go out of their way to buy expensive running shoes, as Nike and many
other footwear superpowers recommend, claiming that they are more comfortable
than cheap running shoes and prevent injuries. Christopher McDougal, however,
claims that all of this is false information planted in the minds of the
consumer by Nike, and good running shoes not only fail to prevent injuries, but
also cause the majority of running
injuries. Apparently, running shoes prevent the user’s feet from automatically
readjusting their stride to prevent injury by providing them with false senses
of protection and stability.
Nike: The Cortéz |
Personally, I found this quite
sensible and intriguing. I suppose when one is in the act of running barefoot,
one must adjust their stride and the method through which one’s feet make
contact with the ground because the pain is apparent, whereas running shoes
provide a false sense of support and prevent the runner from micro-tuning the
method by which their feet make impact with the ground. Nike, of course, knew
this, but did nothing to change their actions, which makes sense in respect to
their own interests, as increasing awareness would decrease revenue. As the
company responsible for inventing the first running shoe, the Cortéz, and
introducing it to the public, the fate of the running shoe industry and its
effects can be traced back and directly linked to Nike. This, of course, is why
Christopher McDougal believes Nike to be at least partially to blame for all
modern running injuries.
No comments:
Post a Comment